Variable Use of Postoperative Imaging Following Ureteroscopy: Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.
Identifieur interne : 000105 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000104; suivant : 000106Variable Use of Postoperative Imaging Following Ureteroscopy: Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.
Auteurs : Casey A. Dauw [États-Unis] ; Khurshid R. Ghani [États-Unis] ; Ji Qi [États-Unis] ; Tae Kim [États-Unis] ; Jaya Telang [États-Unis] ; Brian Seifman [États-Unis] ; Mohammed Jafri [États-Unis] ; Gregor Blix [États-Unis] ; John M. Hollingsworth [États-Unis]Source :
- Urology [ 1527-9995 ] ; 2020.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte (MeSH), Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH), Amélioration de la qualité (MeSH), Calculs rénaux (chirurgie), Complications postopératoires (imagerie diagnostique), Complications postopératoires (prévention et contrôle), Femelle (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Michigan (MeSH), Mâle (MeSH), Soins postopératoires (statistiques et données numériques), Sujet âgé (MeSH), Types de pratiques des médecins (statistiques et données numériques), Urologie (MeSH), Urétéroscopie (MeSH), Utilisation des procédures et des techniques (statistiques et données numériques), Études prospectives (MeSH).
- MESH :
- chirurgie : Calculs rénaux.
- imagerie diagnostique : Complications postopératoires.
- prévention et contrôle : Complications postopératoires.
- statistiques et données numériques : Soins postopératoires, Types de pratiques des médecins, Utilisation des procédures et des techniques.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Amélioration de la qualité, Femelle, Humains, Michigan, Mâle, Sujet âgé, Urologie, Urétéroscopie, Études prospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult (MeSH), Aged (MeSH), Female (MeSH), Humans (MeSH), Kidney Calculi (surgery), Male (MeSH), Michigan (MeSH), Middle Aged (MeSH), Postoperative Care (statistics & numerical data), Postoperative Complications (diagnostic imaging), Postoperative Complications (prevention & control), Practice Patterns, Physicians' (statistics & numerical data), Procedures and Techniques Utilization (statistics & numerical data), Prospective Studies (MeSH), Quality Improvement (MeSH), Ureteroscopy (MeSH), Urology (MeSH).
- MESH :
- geographic : Michigan.
- diagnostic imaging : Postoperative Complications.
- prevention & control : Postoperative Complications.
- statistics & numerical data : Postoperative Care, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Procedures and Techniques Utilization.
- surgery : Kidney Calculi.
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality Improvement, Ureteroscopy, Urology.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To understand patient and practice-level factors impacting postoperative imaging use after ureteroscopy (URS) for urinary stone disease.
METHODS
The Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative's Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones (MUSIC ROCKS) initiative is a consortium of 52 urologists from 11 practices in Michigan. From June 2016 to July 2017, we prospectively collected clinical data for patients undergoing URS for stone treatment by MUSIC ROCKS participants. We measured the proportion of these patients who underwent US, AXR, and/or CT within the first 60 days after their procedure. We then assessed variation in the use of post-URS imaging according to patient characteristics and across MUSIC ROCKS practices.
RESULTS
During the 13-month study period, we identified 2850 patients who were treated with URS for stone disease. Overall, only 47.6% of these patients underwent postoperative imaging. AXR was the most common modality used (55.0% of patients), followed by US (21.9%) and CT (11.1%). As shown in the Figure, use of post-URS imaging varied widely across participating practices (23.7%-73.6%; P <.01). Imaging receipt did not differ by patient age, gender, or insurance status. However, patients with more comorbidities, renal stones and those with larger stones were more likely to receive post-URS imaging (P <.05 for each comparison).
CONCLUSION
Fewer than half of patients in Michigan undergo postoperative imaging after URS for stone disease. Moreover, there is substantial variation across providers in post-URS imaging use. These findings help identify opportunities to improve the quality of care for patients with urinary stone disease in the State.
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.055
PubMed: 31618657
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Variable Use of Postoperative Imaging Following Ureteroscopy: Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.</title><author><name sortKey="Dauw, Casey A" sort="Dauw, Casey A" uniqKey="Dauw C" first="Casey A" last="Dauw">Casey A. Dauw</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: caseydau@med.umich.edu.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ghani, Khurshid R" sort="Ghani, Khurshid R" uniqKey="Ghani K" first="Khurshid R" last="Ghani">Khurshid R. Ghani</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Qi, Ji" sort="Qi, Ji" uniqKey="Qi J" first="Ji" last="Qi">Ji Qi</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kim, Tae" sort="Kim, Tae" uniqKey="Kim T" first="Tae" last="Kim">Tae Kim</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Telang, Jaya" sort="Telang, Jaya" uniqKey="Telang J" first="Jaya" last="Telang">Jaya Telang</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Seifman, Brian" sort="Seifman, Brian" uniqKey="Seifman B" first="Brian" last="Seifman">Brian Seifman</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Michigan Institute of Urology, West Bloomfield, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Michigan Institute of Urology, West Bloomfield</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jafri, Mohammed" sort="Jafri, Mohammed" uniqKey="Jafri M" first="Mohammed" last="Jafri">Mohammed Jafri</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Comprehensive Urology, Royal Oak, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Comprehensive Urology, Royal Oak</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Blix, Gregor" sort="Blix, Gregor" uniqKey="Blix G" first="Gregor" last="Blix">Gregor Blix</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Bronson Urology, Kalamazoo, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Bronson Urology, Kalamazoo</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hollingsworth, John M" sort="Hollingsworth, John M" uniqKey="Hollingsworth J" first="John M" last="Hollingsworth">John M. Hollingsworth</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2020">2020</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:31618657</idno><idno type="pmid">31618657</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.055</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000412</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000412</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000412</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000412</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000412</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Variable Use of Postoperative Imaging Following Ureteroscopy: Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.</title><author><name sortKey="Dauw, Casey A" sort="Dauw, Casey A" uniqKey="Dauw C" first="Casey A" last="Dauw">Casey A. Dauw</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: caseydau@med.umich.edu.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ghani, Khurshid R" sort="Ghani, Khurshid R" uniqKey="Ghani K" first="Khurshid R" last="Ghani">Khurshid R. Ghani</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Qi, Ji" sort="Qi, Ji" uniqKey="Qi J" first="Ji" last="Qi">Ji Qi</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kim, Tae" sort="Kim, Tae" uniqKey="Kim T" first="Tae" last="Kim">Tae Kim</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Telang, Jaya" sort="Telang, Jaya" uniqKey="Telang J" first="Jaya" last="Telang">Jaya Telang</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Seifman, Brian" sort="Seifman, Brian" uniqKey="Seifman B" first="Brian" last="Seifman">Brian Seifman</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Michigan Institute of Urology, West Bloomfield, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Michigan Institute of Urology, West Bloomfield</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jafri, Mohammed" sort="Jafri, Mohammed" uniqKey="Jafri M" first="Mohammed" last="Jafri">Mohammed Jafri</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Comprehensive Urology, Royal Oak, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Comprehensive Urology, Royal Oak</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Blix, Gregor" sort="Blix, Gregor" uniqKey="Blix G" first="Gregor" last="Blix">Gregor Blix</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Bronson Urology, Kalamazoo, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Bronson Urology, Kalamazoo</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hollingsworth, John M" sort="Hollingsworth, John M" uniqKey="Hollingsworth J" first="John M" last="Hollingsworth">John M. Hollingsworth</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Michigan</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Urology</title><idno type="eISSN">1527-9995</idno><imprint><date when="2020" type="published">2020</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Kidney Calculi (surgery)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Michigan (MeSH)</term><term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Postoperative Care (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Postoperative Complications (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Postoperative Complications (prevention & control)</term><term>Practice Patterns, Physicians' (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Procedures and Techniques Utilization (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Prospective Studies (MeSH)</term><term>Quality Improvement (MeSH)</term><term>Ureteroscopy (MeSH)</term><term>Urology (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term><term>Amélioration de la qualité (MeSH)</term><term>Calculs rénaux (chirurgie)</term><term>Complications postopératoires (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Complications postopératoires (prévention et contrôle)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Michigan (MeSH)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Soins postopératoires (statistiques et données numériques)</term><term>Sujet âgé (MeSH)</term><term>Types de pratiques des médecins (statistiques et données numériques)</term><term>Urologie (MeSH)</term><term>Urétéroscopie (MeSH)</term><term>Utilisation des procédures et des techniques (statistiques et données numériques)</term><term>Études prospectives (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Michigan</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="chirurgie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Calculs rénaux</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Postoperative Complications</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Complications postopératoires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Postoperative Complications</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prévention et contrôle" xml:lang="fr"><term>Complications postopératoires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Postoperative Care</term><term>Practice Patterns, Physicians'</term><term>Procedures and Techniques Utilization</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistiques et données numériques" xml:lang="fr"><term>Soins postopératoires</term><term>Types de pratiques des médecins</term><term>Utilisation des procédures et des techniques</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Kidney Calculi</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Quality Improvement</term><term>Ureteroscopy</term><term>Urology</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Amélioration de la qualité</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Michigan</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Urologie</term><term>Urétéroscopie</term><term>Études prospectives</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>OBJECTIVE</b></p><p>To understand patient and practice-level factors impacting postoperative imaging use after ureteroscopy (URS) for urinary stone disease.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>The Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative's Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones (MUSIC ROCKS) initiative is a consortium of 52 urologists from 11 practices in Michigan. From June 2016 to July 2017, we prospectively collected clinical data for patients undergoing URS for stone treatment by MUSIC ROCKS participants. We measured the proportion of these patients who underwent US, AXR, and/or CT within the first 60 days after their procedure. We then assessed variation in the use of post-URS imaging according to patient characteristics and across MUSIC ROCKS practices.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>During the 13-month study period, we identified 2850 patients who were treated with URS for stone disease. Overall, only 47.6% of these patients underwent postoperative imaging. AXR was the most common modality used (55.0% of patients), followed by US (21.9%) and CT (11.1%). As shown in the Figure, use of post-URS imaging varied widely across participating practices (23.7%-73.6%; P <.01). Imaging receipt did not differ by patient age, gender, or insurance status. However, patients with more comorbidities, renal stones and those with larger stones were more likely to receive post-URS imaging (P <.05 for each comparison).</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>Fewer than half of patients in Michigan undergo postoperative imaging after URS for stone disease. Moreover, there is substantial variation across providers in post-URS imaging use. These findings help identify opportunities to improve the quality of care for patients with urinary stone disease in the State.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">31618657</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2020</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>27</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1527-9995</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>136</Volume><PubDate><Year>2020</Year><Month>02</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Urology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Urology</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Variable Use of Postoperative Imaging Following Ureteroscopy: Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>63-69</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0090-4295(19)30873-8</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.055</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVE">To understand patient and practice-level factors impacting postoperative imaging use after ureteroscopy (URS) for urinary stone disease.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS">The Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative's Reducing Operative Complications from Kidney Stones (MUSIC ROCKS) initiative is a consortium of 52 urologists from 11 practices in Michigan. From June 2016 to July 2017, we prospectively collected clinical data for patients undergoing URS for stone treatment by MUSIC ROCKS participants. We measured the proportion of these patients who underwent US, AXR, and/or CT within the first 60 days after their procedure. We then assessed variation in the use of post-URS imaging according to patient characteristics and across MUSIC ROCKS practices.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS">During the 13-month study period, we identified 2850 patients who were treated with URS for stone disease. Overall, only 47.6% of these patients underwent postoperative imaging. AXR was the most common modality used (55.0% of patients), followed by US (21.9%) and CT (11.1%). As shown in the Figure, use of post-URS imaging varied widely across participating practices (23.7%-73.6%; P <.01). Imaging receipt did not differ by patient age, gender, or insurance status. However, patients with more comorbidities, renal stones and those with larger stones were more likely to receive post-URS imaging (P <.05 for each comparison).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION">Fewer than half of patients in Michigan undergo postoperative imaging after URS for stone disease. Moreover, there is substantial variation across providers in post-URS imaging use. These findings help identify opportunities to improve the quality of care for patients with urinary stone disease in the State.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dauw</LastName><ForeName>Casey A</ForeName><Initials>CA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: caseydau@med.umich.edu.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ghani</LastName><ForeName>Khurshid R</ForeName><Initials>KR</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Qi</LastName><ForeName>Ji</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kim</LastName><ForeName>Tae</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Telang</LastName><ForeName>Jaya</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Seifman</LastName><ForeName>Brian</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Michigan Institute of Urology, West Bloomfield, MI.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jafri</LastName><ForeName>Mohammed</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Comprehensive Urology, Royal Oak, MI.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Blix</LastName><ForeName>Gregor</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Bronson Urology, Kalamazoo, MI.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hollingsworth</LastName><ForeName>John M</ForeName><Initials>JM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2019</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Urology</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0366151</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0090-4295</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentIn"><RefSource>Urology. 2020 Feb;136:68-69</RefSource><PMID Version="1">32033685</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentIn"><RefSource>J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):855</RefSource><PMID Version="1">32703107</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007669" MajorTopicYN="N">Kidney Calculi</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008824" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Michigan</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011182" MajorTopicYN="N">Postoperative Care</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="Y">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011183" MajorTopicYN="N">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010818" MajorTopicYN="N">Practice Patterns, Physicians'</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="Y">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000078337" MajorTopicYN="N">Procedures and Techniques Utilization</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="Y">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D058996" MajorTopicYN="Y">Quality Improvement</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018666" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ureteroscopy</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014572" MajorTopicYN="Y">Urology</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2019</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>01</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2019</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>03</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2019</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>05</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2019</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2019</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31618657</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0090-4295(19)30873-8</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.055</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Michigan</li></region></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Michigan"><name sortKey="Dauw, Casey A" sort="Dauw, Casey A" uniqKey="Dauw C" first="Casey A" last="Dauw">Casey A. Dauw</name></region><name sortKey="Blix, Gregor" sort="Blix, Gregor" uniqKey="Blix G" first="Gregor" last="Blix">Gregor Blix</name><name sortKey="Ghani, Khurshid R" sort="Ghani, Khurshid R" uniqKey="Ghani K" first="Khurshid R" last="Ghani">Khurshid R. Ghani</name><name sortKey="Hollingsworth, John M" sort="Hollingsworth, John M" uniqKey="Hollingsworth J" first="John M" last="Hollingsworth">John M. Hollingsworth</name><name sortKey="Jafri, Mohammed" sort="Jafri, Mohammed" uniqKey="Jafri M" first="Mohammed" last="Jafri">Mohammed Jafri</name><name sortKey="Kim, Tae" sort="Kim, Tae" uniqKey="Kim T" first="Tae" last="Kim">Tae Kim</name><name sortKey="Qi, Ji" sort="Qi, Ji" uniqKey="Qi J" first="Ji" last="Qi">Ji Qi</name><name sortKey="Seifman, Brian" sort="Seifman, Brian" uniqKey="Seifman B" first="Brian" last="Seifman">Brian Seifman</name><name sortKey="Telang, Jaya" sort="Telang, Jaya" uniqKey="Telang J" first="Jaya" last="Telang">Jaya Telang</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SanteMusiqueV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000105 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000105 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SanteMusiqueV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:31618657
|texte= Variable Use of Postoperative Imaging Following Ureteroscopy: Results from a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:31618657" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SanteMusiqueV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |